What COP26 means for the Co-op


Fonterra’s Amsterdam based Trade Strategy and Stakeholder Affairs Manager, Mark Casey, recently attended COP26 – the annual United Nations Convention on Climate in Glasgow. 

Here are his thoughts on this globally significant event and what it means for the Co-op.

Earlier this month I had the opportunity to head to the (almost) annual Conference of Parties, or more commonly referred to as COP.

Mark Casey, Fonterra’s Amsterdam based Trade Strategy and Stakeholder Affairs Manager at COP26

This was the 26th COP since the United Nations Convention on Climate Change began and was touted as the most important since COP21 in 2015 when the Paris Agreement was signed.

The best way to describe COP is two distinct parts. The first is where all the officials get together and negotiations take place, culminating in a final agreement being reached. Then there’s an area that’s like a mini expo with countries and industries having booths to hold panel events, discussions and showcase their country and its efforts towards climate change.


Over the week I was there I attended (and presented at) a number of sessions on agriculture and climate change along with Zoom sessions with the New Zealand Government’s negotiating team, plus a breakfast meeting with Minister for Climate Change, James Shaw.

Fonterra is part of the Global Dairy Platform (GDP), which is a group of dairy companies from around the world who work together to show the sector’s commitment for responsible and sustainable food production.

Mark Casey, Trade Strategy and Stakeholder Affairs Manager, Fonterra Amsterdam

Here’s a brief rundown of the top four things that happened at COP that relate to the Co-op.

Overall outcome

At the beginning of COP26 three objectives were set out.

  • Get commitments to cut emissions to keep within reach of the global warming limit of 1.5 degrees (over pre-industrial levels).
  • Reach the target of $100 billion per year of climate finance to developing and vulnerable countries.
  • Complete the rulebook around the Paris Agreement, which seeks to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees.

On the 1.5 degree target – this was not achieved, but has a “weak pulse” as COP26’s UK President Alok Sharma puts it. Prior to COP26 the planet was on track for 2.7 degrees, and with the agreements reached at COP26 it’s now predicted we’re on a path between 1.8 and 2.4 degrees, so a lot of countries may need to sharpen their pencils a bit. Countries have, however, agreed to revisit their commitments by the end of next year to ensure they’re on track to reach less than 1.5 degrees warming.

For funding, there was recognition that many countries had fallen short of the $100bn target, and financing efforts have been ramped up; New Zealand has announced a quadrupling of its contributions in this area.

Breakfast meeting with Minister of Climate Change, James Shaw

And importantly, the so called ‘Rule Book’ left outstanding from Paris 2015 was settled – an important step that should now mean that countries are properly held to account for their emissions, requiring transparent reporting and avoiding dubious ‘off-setting’ of carbon credits.

In order to deliver on these promises, an agreement was reached to accelerate efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power and inefficient fossil fuel subsidies – and although the wording is not as strong as many at COP26 would have preferred, it is still a milestone to have coal and fossil fuels expressly called out in this agreement for the first time. This is unlikely to impact us as a Co-op as it’s more about using coal to generate power and we’ve already committed to getting out of coal by 2037.

So, these were the ‘big ticket’ items of the agreement; there were many other important side agreements and outcomes reached between the COP26 parties, which I simply don’t have room to cover here, but some of the more New Zealand and agriculture specific issues follow below.

New Zealand’s recent target to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030

Technically this was announced prior to COP26, but it was part of the New Zealand Government’s ‘homework’ it needed to get done in preparation – ramping this up from the previous 30% to 50% by 2030.

It’s acknowledged that much of the reduction in emissions will be achieved by buying offsets internationally. We’re not sure what this increased commitment will mean for us at this stage, but we have provided input into the Emissions Reduction Plan, which will come into force next year, so it’s a bit of a wait and see situation at the moment. However, there will be increased scrutiny in years to come around the quality of carbon offsets, so the work we have already set in motion with trusted partners in this space sets us up well for where these are necessary in our net zero ambitions.

Methane Pledge

This is a big one for New Zealand, and took many by surprise, including the New Zealand Government, when it was announced earlier than anticipated. New Zealand is one of 105 countries who have joined a global alliance which together has pledged to reduce methane by 30% by 2030. There was some criticism around this as New Zealand has a target of 10% methane reduction.

It’s important to note it’s a collective target focused mainly on the global oil and gas sector and technology already exists to mitigate methane from those sectors.

As we know, biogenic methane is a lot harder to solve, but the New Zealand Government is ahead of many others by having a hard target and they’re working with the likes of Fonterra to find a solution to the methane puzzle. Reductions in this area by Fonterra will have a meaningful impact for New Zealand’s role in that global pledge.

Global Dairy Platform - Pathways to Net Zero

Fonterra is part of the Global Dairy Platform (GDP), which is a group of dairy companies from around the world who work together to show the sector’s commitment for responsible and sustainable food production. They recently launched an initiative to accelerate climate change action in the dairy sector, which we have signed up for.

They held a panel event, where they talked about the need to have a science and evidence-based approach to reaching climate neutral food systems, and the part dairy plays in that.

Agriculture is not expressly mentioned in the main COP26 agreement despite there being a number of panels and discussions related to our sector. It was encouraging to see a separate multi-government workstream (the Koronivia Joint Work plan) recognised that agriculture is part of the solution to climate change and plays a crucial role in global food systems and bio-diversity. It will be interesting to see what COP27 (hosted in Egypt next year) presents for agriculture, as food security will likely take a higher priority, and issues such as regenerative farming, bio-diversity and carbon sequestration gather more momentum.

It was an eventful few days and an incredible event to be part of. While by no means an expert on climate change, I have certainly learnt a lot from what I have seen and heard at COP26, and gained some real insights into the overall environmental importance of global food systems like ours, and the part we can all play in providing nutritional goodness, in a sustainable way, for generations.